Monday 29 April 2013

PRACTICAL 1: EMULSION




FACULTY OF PHRMACY

TECHNOLOGY PHARMACEUTICAL II
NFNF 2263

LABORATORY REPORT
PRACTICAL 1: EMULSION

 GROUP B4

LECTURER'S NAME :
DR. NG SHIOW FERN

GROUP MEMBERS:
1.    LEE LI SHAN A136251
2.    YIP LEE ANN A136282
3.    MUHAMMAD SHAHIR BIN ABU BAKAR A136436
4.    AINAA ZURIANI BINTI ABDUL AZIZ A136650
5.    NOOR FARAHIN BINTI ARIFFIN A136602










Practical 1: 
Different impact assessment on the content of the features of an emulsion.


Introduction
             
     Emulsion is a mixture of disperse system consisting two immiscible liquids where one is dispersed as droplets in another. The liquid droplets are also known as disperse or internal phase, while the liquid in which they are dispersed is called continuous or external phase. The disperse phase or continuous phase of a pharmaceutical emulsion is usually water and oil. An emulsion is described as oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion when the continuous phase is water while it may be described as water-in-oil (w/o) when the continuous phase is oil. Emulsion is highly unstable systems due to high surface tension that exist between the two phases. Thus, it needs a third component, which is an emulsifying agent that helps in stabilizing the emulsion.
       Hydrophile-lipophile balance, or HLB is a method used to determine the quantity and select the appropriate surfactant that is needed to produce a stable emulsion. It is only applied to non-ionic Tween and Span type emulsifiers. The number 1 to 20 is assigned to each surfactant to express numerically the size and strength of the polar portion relative to the non-polar portion of the molecule. The HLB value can be determined based on the using of this formula:



HLB value = (quantity surfactant 1)(HLB surfactant 1) +
                      (quantity surfactant 2)(HLB surfactant 2)   
                     ______________________________________
                      Quantity surfactant 1 + Quantity surfactant 2

 
Aim
1-      To determine the effect of HLB surfactant on the stability of emulsion
2-      To study the physical and stability effects on the formulation of emulsion due to the different types of emulsifier agents. 

Apparatus
       Test tubes, cylinder of 50 ml, two sets of pasture pipette and droppers, mixing Vortex’s apparatus, weighing boat, mortar and pestle, light microscope, slides, one set of pipette of 5 ml and bulb, 50 ml beaker, 15 ml centrifuge, coulter counter apparatus, centrifuge device, Viscometer device, water bath (45ºC), refrigerator (4ºC).

Materials
        Palm oil, arachis oil, olive oil, mineral oil, distilled water, Span 20, Tween 80, Sudan III solution (0.5ºC), Isoton III solution

Procedure
          
       Every test tube been labeled and 1 cm is drawn from bottom of the test tube. For our group, we mixed 4 ml of mineral oil and 4 ml of distilled water into the test tube. For every mixing of oil and water, Span 20 and Tween 80 been dropped. The test tube is closed with its cap and mixing is done by using Vortex mixing device for 45 seconds. The time needed for the interphase to reach 1 cm is recorded. The HLB value for every sample is calculated. Then, a few drops of Sudan III solution are dropped on 1 gram of emulsion that been produced in a weighing boat and flattened. The colour distribution of the sample is described and compared. Some of the sample is taken and flattened on glass slide and observation is done under the light microscope. The shape and globule size is drawn together with a description and comparison.
        The next experiment is by using wet gum method, formulation of mineral oil emulsion of 50 g is produced by using the formula below:

 
Mineral oil                                           35 ml
Acacia                                                  6.25 g
Syrup                                                    5 ml
Vanillin                                                 2 g
Alcohol                                                 3 ml
Distilled water, qs                                50 ml

         All the substances above are weighed accurately. Based on wet gum method, acacia powder is added to the mortar and triturated with water until smooth gum is obtained. Then, oil is added to the mixture while triturating continuously until smooth emulsion is obtained.
        40 g of emulsion that has successful been produced is put into 50 ml beaker and homogenous process is been conducted for 2 minute by using magnetic stirrer.

Emulsion
Group
Mineral oil (ml)
I
1 , 5
20
II
2 ,6
25
III
3 ,7
30
IV
4 ,8
35
 
Table 3
          2 g of emulsion that is produced before and after homogenous process is weighed on weighing boat and been labeled. A few drops of Sudan III solution are dropped and flattened. The texture, consistency, degree of oil surface and the spreading of colour are differentiate and describe under light microscope.
          The viscosity of the emulsion that is formed after homogenous process is determined by using viscometer tool that has been calibrated with ‘Spindle’ from LV-4 type. Later, the sample been exposed at 45 ºC for 30 minutes and 4 ºC for 30 minutes. The viscosity later is determined after the emulsion has completely exposed under stated temperatures and when the emulsion has reached room temperature for 10-15 minutes.5 g of emulsion that has been homogenous is filled in centrifuge tube and centrifugation process is done at 4500 rpm for 10 minutes at 25 ºC. The height separated is measured and the fraction of the separation that resulted from the emulsion is determined.


Results and Calculation 
  1. The time required to get a separated phase of 1cm.

Palm oil:


Tube No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Span 20 (drops)
15
12
12
6
6
3
0
0
Tween 80 (drops)
3
6
9
9
15
18
15
0
HLB value
9.67
10.73
11.34
12.44
13.17
14.09
15.00
0.00
Phase separation time (min)
116.00
121.00
135.00
49.00
132.00
32.00
26.00
8.00
Stability
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No

 
Arachis oil:

Tube No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Span 20 (drops)
15
12
12
6
6
3
0
0
Tween 80 (drops)
3
6
9
9
15
18
15
0
HLB value
9.67
10.73
11.34
12.44
13.17
14.09
15.00
0.00
Phase separation time (min)
-
-
-
45.00
37.00
18.00
77.00
2.00
Stability
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No


Olive oil:
Tube No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Span 20 (drops)
15
12
12
6
6
3
0
0
Tween 80 (drops)
3
6
9
9
15
18
15
0
HLB value
9.67
10.73
11.34
12.44
13.17
14.09
15.00
0.00
Phase separation time (min)
40.00
-
-
64.00
59.00
21.00
34.00
5.00
Stability
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No


Mineral oil:
Tube No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Span 20 (drops)
15
12
12
6
6
3
0
0
Tween 80 (drops)
3
6
9
9
15
18
15
0
HLB value
9.67
10.73
11.34
12.44
13.17
14.09
15.00
0.00
Phase separation time (min)
-
-
-
-
55.00
47.00
12.00
0.00
Stability
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No


2.   Description on shape and globule size that are formed. 






Test Tube
Physical Characteristics
1
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small globules evenly dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Thus, it is oil in water emulsion
2
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small globules evenly dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Thus, it is oil in water emulsion
3
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small and large globules dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Thus, it is oil in water emulsion
4
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small and large globules dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Thus, it is oil in water emulsion
5
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small and large globules dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Thus, it is oil in water emulsion
6
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small and large globules dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Thus, it is oil in water emulsion
7
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small and large globules unevenly dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Thus, it is oil in water emulsion
8
Naked eye:
·         Sudan III not soluble
Microscopic:
·         Small and large globules very unevenly dispersed
·         Globules stained red
Emulsion is not formed without surfactant, phase separation occur very fast



Emulsion
Characteristics
I
Before homogenization
·         Naked eyes: less milky, less viscous, more oily
·         Microscopic: more globules, red stain is unevenly dispersed
After homogenization
·         Naked eyes: milky, more viscous, less oily
·         Microscopic: less and smaller globules, red stain evenly dispersed
II
Before homogenization
·         Naked eyes: milky, oily, less viscous
·         Microscopic: many globules, red stain is unevenly dispersed
After homogenization
·         Naked eyes: more viscous, less oily
·         Microscopic: less and smaller globules, red stain evenly dispersed
III
Before homogenization
·         Naked eyes: cloudy, less viscous, more oily
·         Microscopic: more globules, red stain is unevenly dispersed
After homogenization
·         Naked eyes: milky, more viscous, less oily
·         Microscopic: smaller globules, red stain evenly dispersed
IV
Before homogenization
·         Naked eyes: cloudy, less viscous, more oily
·         Microscopic: not uniform in size, red stain is unevenly dispersed
After homogenization
·         Naked eyes: milky, more viscous, less oily
·         Microscopic: smaller globules , uniform in size, red stain evenly dispersed














































3. VISCOSITY OF EMULSION :



Difference =    Average of after temperature cycle-
Average of before temperature cycle              x          100%
                        Average of before temperature cycle

At 20 mL of Palm Oil:

Readings


Group
Viscosity (cP)

Average + SD
1
2
3
Before temperature cycle
1
150
100
150

78.33 ± 57.57
5
20
20
30
After temperature cycle
1
200
200
250

114.17 ± 103.86
5
10
10
15
Difference (%)
45.76%


At 25 mL of Arachis Oil:

Readings


Group

Viscosity (cP)

Average + SD
1
2
3
Before temperature cycle
2
30
60
120

60.00 ± 28.28
6
50
50
50
After temperature cycle
2
120
120
90

105.00 ± 11.18

6
100
100
100
Difference (%)

75%













At 30 mL of Olive Oil:


Readings


Group
Viscosity (cP)

Average + SD
1
2
3
Before temperature cycle
3
420
480
540

490.00 ± 46.19
7
450
500
550
After temperature cycle
3
2800
2650
2460
2626.67 ± 219.97
7
3000
2500
2350
Difference (%)
436.06%












For 35 mL of Mineral Oil :


Readings

Group
Viscosity (cP)

Average + SD
1
2
3
Before temperature cycle
4
5750
5800
5850

7363.33 ± 1563.83
8
8900
8900
8980
After temperature cycle
4
7300
7100
7200

11325.00 ± 4129.14
8
15650
15600
15100
Difference (%)
53.80%












SEPARATION HEIGHT

Height ratio     =          Separation phase
                                    Emulsion phase


20 mL Coconut Oil :

Interphase
Height (mm)

Average
Group 1
Group 5
Separation phase
29
40

Original emulsion
46
50
Height ratio
0.63
0.80
0.715










25 mL Arachis Oil :

Interphase
Height (mm)

Average
Group 2
Group 6
Separation phase
33
35

Emulsion phase
55
50
Height ratio
0.64
0.70
0.670






30 mL Olive Oil :

Interphase
Height (mm)

Average
Group 3
Group 7
Separation phase
14
11

Emulsion phase
50
50
Height ratio
0.28
0.22
0.250









35 mL Mineral Oil :

Interphase
Height (mm)

Average
Group 4
Group 8
Separation phase
15
11

Emulsion phase
55
50
Height ratio
0.27
0.22
0.245






No comments:

Post a Comment